🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, threatening messages recurred. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, subsequently from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was called to the local precinct and instructed bluntly: keep quiet or experience severe repercussions.

Shaikh is among those resisting a expensive initiative where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – is scheduled to be razed and redeveloped by a multinational conglomerate.

"The unique ecosystem of this area is like nowhere else in the world," states Shaikh. "However their intention is to dismantle our social fabric and stop us speaking out."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the soaring skyscrapers and Bollywood penthouses that overshadow the area. Homes are built haphazardly and frequently without proper sanitation, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the environment is saturated with the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.

For certain residents, the vision of the slum's redevelopment into a developed area of premium apartments, neat parks, contemporary malls and apartments with two toilets is an aspirational dream achieved.

"We lack proper healthcare, paved pathways or drainage and there are no spaces for children to play," states a chai seller, in his fifties, who migrated from his home state in the early eighties. "The single option is to clear the area and construct proper housing."

Resident Opposition

Yet certain residents, such as the leather artisan, are opposing the project.

Everyone acknowledges that Dharavi, long neglected as informal housing, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. Yet they worry that this project – lacking resident participation – could potentially transform valuable urban land into a luxury development, evicting the disadvantaged, migrant communities who have been there since the late 1800s.

These were these marginalized, migrant workers who built up the vacant wetlands into an extensively researched phenomenon of local enterprise and commercial output, whose output is valued at between a significant amount and $2m per year, making it among the globe's biggest unofficial markets.

Relocation Worries

Out of about a million people living in the crowded 220-hectare zone, a minority will be qualified for replacement housing in the project, which is projected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Additional residents will be transferred to wastelands and coastal regions on the distant periphery of Mumbai, potentially break up a long-established social network. A portion will be denied residences at all.

Those allowed to continue living in the area will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a major break from the evolved, communal way of living and working that has sustained Dharavi for so long.

Businesses from clothing production to clay work and recycling are expected to reduce in scale and be relocated to a specific "industrial sector" far from residential areas.

Livelihood Crisis

In the case of Shaikh, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to live in this community, the project presents a survival challenge. His informal, three-floor facility produces apparel – tailored coats, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – sold in luxury boutiques in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.

Relatives resides in the accommodations downstairs and his workers and garment workers – migrants from different regions – reside on-site, allowing him to manage costs. Outside the slum, accommodation prices are typically tenfold more expensive for a single room.

Pressure and Coercion

Within the administrative buildings close by, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative illustrates a very different vision for the future. Fashionable residents gather on cycles and electric vehicles, buying western-style baguettes and croissants and socializing on a patio outside a restaurant and treat station. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that sustains Dharavi's community.

"This represents no development for our community," explains the protester. "It represents a huge real estate deal that will price people out for our community to continue."

Furthermore, there's distrust of the corporate group. Managed by a prominent businessman – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the government head – the conglomerate has encountered allegations of preferential treatment and ethical concerns, which it denies.

While administrative bodies describes it as a partnership, the business group invested $950m for its majority share. Legal proceedings stating that the project was unfairly awarded to the business group is being considered in India's supreme court.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to actively protest the project, local opponents claim they have been experienced ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – comprising communications, explicit warnings and insinuations that opposing the project was tantamount to speaking against the country – by individuals they allege are associated with the developer.

Among those suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c