🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.